ArticleJournal of imaging2025
We Need to Talk About Lung Ultrasound Score: Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission with Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The admission of COVID-19 patients to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is largely dependent on illness severity, yet no standard criteria exist for this decision. Here, lung ultrasound (LU) data, blood gas analysis (BGA), and clinical parameters from venous blood tests (VBTs) were used, along with machine-learning (ML) models to predict the need for ICU admission. Data from fifty-one COVID-19 patients, including ICU admission status, were collected. The information from LU was gathered through the identification of LU findings (LUFs): B-lines, irregular pleura, subpleural, and lobar consolidations. LU scores (LUSs) were computed by summing predefined weights assigned to each LUF, as reported in previous studies. In addition, individual LUFs were analyzed without calculating a total LUS. Support vector machine models were built, combining the available clinical data to predict ICU admissions. The application of ML models to individual LUFs outperformed standard LUS approaches reported in previous studies. Moreover, combining LU data with results from other medical exams improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model with the best overall performance used variables from all three exams (BGA, LU, VBT), achieving an AUC of 95.5%. Overall, the results demonstrate the significant role of ML models in improving the prediction of ICU admission. Additionally, applying ML specifically to LUFs provided better results compared to traditional approaches that rely on traditional LUSs. The results of this paper are deployed on a web app.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.