ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Dual-Model Synergy for Fingerprint Spoof Detection Using VGG16 and ResNet50.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- GaitSpoofNet: advanced spatio-temporal architectures for vision-based presentation attack detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we address the challenge of fingerprint liveness detection by proposing a dual pre-trained model approach that combines VGG16 and ResNet50 architectures. While existing methods often rely on a single feature extraction model, they may struggle with generalization across diverse spoofing materials and sensor types. To overcome this limitation, our approach leverages the high-resolution feature extraction of VGG16 and the deep layer architecture of ResNet50 to capture a more comprehensive range of features for improved spoof detection. The proposed approach integrates these two models by concatenating their extracted features, which are then used to classify the captured fingerprint as live or spoofed. Evaluated on the Livedet2013 and Livedet2015 datasets, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an accuracy of 99.72% on Livedet2013, surpassing existing methods like the Gram model (98.95%) and Pre-trained CNN (98.45%). On Livedet2015, our method achieves an average accuracy of 96.32%, outperforming several state-of-the-art models, including CNN (95.27%) and LivDet 2015 (95.39%). Error rate analysis reveals consistently low Bonafide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER) scores with 0.28% on LivDet 2013 and 1.45% on LivDet 2015. Similarly, the Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) remains low at 0.35% on LivDet 2013 and 3.68% on LivDet 2015. However, higher APCER values are observed for unknown spoof materials, particularly in the Crossmatch subset of Livedet2015, where the APCER rises to 8.12%. These findings highlight the robustness and adaptability of our simple dual-model framework while identifying areas for further optimization in handling unseen spoof materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.