ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Validation of Novel Image Processing Method for Objective Quantification of Intra-Articular Bleeding During Arthroscopic Procedures.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of epinephrine-infused irrigation fluid on visual clarity in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Tranexamic acid in arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears in the shoulder: a randomized trial.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual clarity is crucial for shoulder arthroscopy, directly influencing surgical precision and outcomes. Despite advances in imaging technology, intraoperative bleeding remains a significant obstacle to optimal visibility, with subjective evaluation methods lacking consistency and standardization. This study proposes a novel image processing system to objectively quantify bleeding and assess surgical effectiveness. The system uses color recognition algorithms to calculate a bleeding score based on pixel ratios by incorporating multiple color spaces to enhance accuracy and minimize errors. Moreover, 200 three-second video clips from prior arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were evaluated by three senior surgeons trained on the system's color metrics and scoring process. Assessments were repeated two weeks later to test intraobserver reliability. The system's scores were compared to the average score given by the surgeons. The average surgeon-assigned score was 5.10 (range: 1-9.66), while the system scored videos from 1 to 9.46, with an average of 5.08. The mean absolute error between system and surgeon scores was 0.56, with a standard deviation of 0.50, achieving agreement ranging from [0.96,0.98] with 96.7% confidence (ICC = 0.967). This system provides a standardized method to evaluate intraoperative bleeding, enabling the precise detection of blood variations and supporting advanced technologies like autonomous arthropumps to enhance arthroscopy and surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.