Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997542›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Validation of Novel Image Processing Method for Objective Quantification of Intra-Articular Bleeding During Arthroscopic Procedures.

Olgar Birsel, Umut Zengin, Ilker Eren, Ali Ersen, Beren Semiz, Mehmet Demirhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effect of epinephrine-infused irrigation fluid on visual clarity in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olgar BirselDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.
Umut ZenginDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Koc University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0000-6977-5515
Ilker ErenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali ErsenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey.
Beren SemizDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Koc University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7544-5974
Mehmet DemirhanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Koc University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual clarity is crucial for shoulder arthroscopy, directly influencing surgical precision and outcomes. Despite advances in imaging technology, intraoperative bleeding remains a significant obstacle to optimal visibility, with subjective evaluation methods lacking consistency and standardization. This study proposes a novel image processing system to objectively quantify bleeding and assess surgical effectiveness. The system uses color recognition algorithms to calculate a bleeding score based on pixel ratios by incorporating multiple color spaces to enhance accuracy and minimize errors. Moreover, 200 three-second video clips from prior arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were evaluated by three senior surgeons trained on the system's color metrics and scoring process. Assessments were repeated two weeks later to test intraobserver reliability. The system's scores were compared to the average score given by the surgeons. The average surgeon-assigned score was 5.10 (range: 1-9.66), while the system scored videos from 1 to 9.46, with an average of 5.08. The mean absolute error between system and surgeon scores was 0.56, with a standard deviation of 0.50, achieving agreement ranging from [0.96,0.98] with 96.7% confidence (ICC = 0.967). This system provides a standardized method to evaluate intraoperative bleeding, enabling the precise detection of blood variations and supporting advanced technologies like autonomous arthropumps to enhance arthroscopy and surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

arthroscopybleedingimage processingobjective scoringvisual clarity

Identifiers

PMID39997542
PMCPMC11856628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.