ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Effect of Peri-Interventional Blood Loss on In-Stent Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper evaluates the effect of blood loss on in-stent stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nine hundred and ninety-seven patients who underwent PCI for AMI as well as follow-up coronary angiography at 6-12 months from two centers were categorized into three groups based on peri-interventional blood loss at the primary intervention (mild, <1 mmol/L moderate, 1-2 mmol/L; severe > 2 mmol/L). The endpoint was to evaluate the incidence and severity of in-stent stenosis at follow-up angiography and the revascularization rate. The incidence of in-stent stenosis and revascularization in mild, moderate, and severe groups was 19.3%, 33.1%, and 61.1%, respectively (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.