ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Key Factors of Adherence in Cardiological Follow-Up of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Emotion Regulation Interventions for Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- How Emotion Regulation and Illness Identity Shape Mental Health in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Construction of the swallowing function management program based on cognitive emotion regulation for patients with laryngeal cancer: a Delphi study in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- From Fear to Vaccination: Changing Needs of Congenital Heart Defect Patients and Relatives over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 50% of adults with congenital heart defects (ACHD) lack specialised CHD care, increasing the risk of preventable complications and mortality. While there is evidence that psychological factors significantly influence adherence, predictors of attending cardiological routine examinations in ACHD remain understudied. This is the first German study to examine psychological and sociodemographic predictors of adherence in ACHD using the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation as a framework. A total of N = 1136 participants from the National Register for Congenital Heart Defects were analysed. Sociodemographic and psychological factors (illness perception, illness identity, emotion regulation and psychological distress) were recorded as predictors of the subjective importance of regular cardiological check-ups and the actual utilisation frequency. The results indicate that of the sociodemographic factors, only age is relevant for the subjective importance, while net income influences the actual utilisation of cardiological examinations. In contrast, several psychological aspects of illness perception, such as perceived treatment benefit, and illness identity play a role for both adherence measures, as do depressive symptoms for the frequency of examinations. Our results highlight the importance of addressing psychological factors and providing clear information about the benefits of cardiological care to improve adherence in ACHD and thereby reduce secondary diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.