ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Shifts in Soil Fungal Community and Trophic Modes During Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration.
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ITS2 amplicon profiling reveals site-specific mycobiomes in Avicennia marina rhizospheres along the red sea coast.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Urban Mangroves Under Threat: Metagenomic Analysis Reveals a Surge in Human and Plant Pathogenic Fungi.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Topographic Habitat Drive the Change of Soil Fungal Community and Vegetation Soil Characteristics in the Rhizosphere ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mangrove ecosystems are valuable coastal ecosystems; however, studies on the diversity and functional features of their soil fungal communities during restoration are limited. In this study, we examined fungal diversity and trophic modes across mudflat, young mangrove, and mature mangrove stages. We found that Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the dominant phyla, with saprotrophs as the most abundant trophic mode. The abundance of the major phyla and trophic modes significantly varied across restoration stages. Although fungal alpha (α)-diversity remained stable among the stages, beta (β)-diversity showed significant differentiation. Spearman's analysis and partial Mantel tests revealed that total nitrogen and inorganic phosphorus significantly influenced the fungal α-diversity, whereas temperature and pH primarily shaped the fungal β-diversity. Total nitrogen and carbon were key factors affecting the trophic mode α-diversity, whereas total phosphorus and inorganic phosphorus were the main drivers of the trophic mode β-diversity. Variation partitioning analysis confirmed that nutrients, rather than soil properties, were the primary factors shaping fungal communities and trophic modes. Random forest analysis identified key bioindicators, including species such as Paraphyton cookei, and trophic modes such as saprotrophs, both of which were strongly influenced by soil carbon. These findings advance our understanding of fungal ecology in mangrove restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.