ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Enhanced Lymph Node Detection in Colon Cancer Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: A Systematic Review of Studies from 2020 Onwards.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence guided lymph node mapping for determination of resection margins in colon cancer - ISCAPE trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Trial
- [Sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal and anal tumors from the beginning until now].Magyar onkologia · 2026Article
- Reimagining Nodal Staging in Colorectal Cancer: Toward a Novel Non-Invasive Imaging Approach.Cancers · 2026Review
- Fluorescence-guided surgery in colorectal cancer: current evidence, quantitative advances, and future perspectives.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy and visceral surgery: current status and potentials for interdisciplinary patient care.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.