ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Rescuing DNMT1 fails to fully reverse the molecular and functional repercussions of its loss in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single cell CRISPR screen identifies antagonism between Nsd1-H3K36me2 and Ezh2-H3K27me3 orchestrates pluripotency transition.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- DNMT3A in cancer: from epigenetic writer to oncogenic driver.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- Mapping early PRC2 nucleation sites upon Suz12 reintroduction reveals features ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic mechanisms are crucial for developmental programming and can be disrupted by environmental stressors, increasing susceptibility to disease. This has sparked interest in therapies for restoring epigenetic balance, but it remains uncertain whether disordered epigenetic mechanisms can be fully corrected. Disruption of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), responsible for DNA methylation maintenance, has particularly devastating biological consequences. Therefore, here we explored if rescuing DNMT1 activity is sufficient to reverse the effects of its loss utilizing mouse embryonic stem cells. However, only partial reversal could be achieved. Extensive changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and gene expression were detected, along with transposable element derepression and genomic instability. Reduction of cellular size, complexity, and proliferation rate were observed, as well as lasting effects in germ layer lineages and embryoid bodies. Interestingly, by analyzing the impact on imprinted regions, we uncovered 20 regions exhibiting imprinted-like signatures. Notably, while many permanent effects persisted throughout Dnmt1 inactivation and rescue, others arose from the rescue intervention. Lastly, rescuing DNMT1 after differentiation initiation worsened outcomes, reinforcing the need for early intervention. Our findings highlight the far-reaching functions of DNMT1 and provide valuable perspectives on the repercussions of epigenetic perturbations during early development and the challenges of rescue interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.