ArticleAudiology research2025
High-Resolution EEG Amplifiers Are Feasible for Electrocochleography Without Time Restriction.
Article in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe gold standard for electrocochleography (ECochG) is using dedicated recording devices for auditory evoked potentials. However, these have a very limited time window for recording. The aim of this study is to evaluate EEG amplifiers for ECochG, in particular for recording cochlear microphonics (CMs) without time restriction.
methodsThree high-resolution EEG amplifiers and different types of electrodes were analyzed and compared with a clinical system for recording auditory evoked potentials. For this, CMs were recorded after stimulation with various stimuli in a dummy and in human subjects. In the latter, recordings were made from the tympanic membrane and, during otosurgical procedures, from the promontory. Our evaluation focused on comparing signal amplifiers and electrode types, considering the signal-to-noise ratio, recording characteristics, and measurement reliability.
resultsUsing a dummy model, we observed significant differences among devices, electrode types, and stimulus frequencies. These findings were subsequently confirmed in human participant measurements. Nevertheless, EEG amplifiers proved to be feasible for ECochG recordings and offered a recording fidelity comparable to proprietary clinical methods. Importantly, with EEG amplifiers, we were able to record cochlear potentials in response to speech stimuli, revealing a strong correlation (r = 0.78) between recorded signals and the input stimulus.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that high resolution EEG amplifiers are suitable for recording cochlear potentials, in particular, CMs. This allows for evaluating cochlear signals in response to extended stimuli, in particular, speech stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.