ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploiting Arch-like Foot Structure for Knee-Extended Walking in Bipedal Robots.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigates the locomotion of bipedal robots, with a focus on knee-extended walking. While knee joint extension is essential for efficient human walking, humanoid robots face challenges such as pose singularities, and traditional control methods often result in high joint velocities. To address these issues, static approaches have been proposed to achieve knee-extended walking. In this study, we present a pattern generation method based on the inertial linear inverted pendulum model (ILIPM) to simulate human arch motion. A quadrilateral foot structure and compliant control of the virtual leg are designed to enable knee-extended walking in biped robots. To enhance stability, we combine linear feedback control with an ankle joint strategy to correct the deviation of the divergent component of motion (DCM). Experimental comparisons were conducted across three scenarios: bent-knee walking, knee-extended walking without compliance control, and knee-extended walking with compliance control. The results show that knee-extended walking with compliance control results in the lowest energy consumption and minimizes the root mean square error (RMSE) of the center of mass (COM) velocity oscillations. Additionally, ILIPM-based walking experiments demonstrate smooth periodic oscillations of the COM trajectory with an amplitude of approximately 0.015 m. In the comparison of LIPM, Flywheel LIPM, and ILIPM, the ILIPM approach showed the least impact on the COM posture angle and angular momentum, leading to improved walking stability. Finally, DCM error correction experiments revealed that combining ankle joint control with linear feedback control provides the most effective correction of DCM errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.