Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997111›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

AI-Optimized Lattice Structures for Biomechanics Scaffold Design.

Francis T Omigbodun, Bankole I Oladapo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francis T OmigbodunWolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9745-5655
Bankole I OladapoSchool of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-9117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research paper explores the development of AI-optimized lattice structures for biomechanics scaffold design, aiming to enhance bone implant functionality by utilizing advanced human-AI systems. The primary objective is to create scaffold structures that mimic the mechanical properties of natural bone and improve bioactivity and biocompatibility, adapting to patient-specific needs. We employed polylactic acid (PLA), calcium hydroxyapatite (cHAP), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as base materials, leveraging their synergistic properties. The scaffolds were intricately designed using nTopology software (nTop 5.12) and fabricated via 3D printing techniques, optimizing for biomechanical load-bearing and cellular integration. The study's findings highlight a notable enhancement in the mechanical properties of the scaffolds, with the Gyroid lattice design demonstrating a 20% higher energy-absorption capacity than traditional designs. Thermal and chemical analysis revealed a 15% increase in the thermal stability of the composites, enhancing their resilience under physiological conditions. However, the research identified minor inconsistencies in filament diameter during 3D printing, which could affect scaffold uniformity. These findings underscore the potential of integrating AI-driven design with advanced material composites in revolutionizing orthopedic implant technologies.

Indexed as

3D printing technologyalgorithmic scaffold modelingcomputational designdata-driven materialhuman–AI systemsmachine learning optimization

Identifiers

PMID39997111
PMCPMC11853473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.