Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997013›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

Bioluminescent Microbial Bioreporters: A Personal Perspective.

Shimshon Belkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. BacterialBiosensors · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shimshon BelkinInstitute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8283-1673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review attempts to summarize my three decades-long involvement in, and contribution to, the design, construction and testing of bioluminescent microbial sensor strains (bioreporters). With the understanding that such a document cannot be completely free of bias, the review focuses on studies from my own lab only, with almost no coverage of the parallel progress made by others in similar fields. This admittedly subjective approach by no way detracts from the achievements of countless excellent researchers who are not mentioned here, and whose contributions to the field are at least as important as that of my own. The review covers basic aspects of microbial sensor design, and then progresses to describe approaches to performance improvement of sensor strains aimed at the detection of either specific chemicals, groups of chemicals sharing similar characteristics, or global effects, such as toxicity and genotoxicity. The need for integration of live sensor cells into a compatible hardware platform is highlighted, as is the importance of long-term maintenance of the cells' viability and activity. The use of multi-member sensors' panels is presented as a means for enhancing the detection spectrum and sample "fingerprinting", along with a list of different purposes to which such sensors have been put to use.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesLuminescent MeasurementsBacteriabioluminescencebioreportersenvironmental monitoringgenotoxicitytoxicitywhole-cell biosensors

Identifiers

PMID39997013
PMCPMC11853290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.