Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996996›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2025

Intelligent Microfluidics for Plasma Separation: Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning for Optimized Microchannel Design.

Kavita Manekar, Manish L Bhaiyya, Meghana A Hasamnis, Madhusudan B Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kavita ManekarDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Shri. Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.ORCID 0009-0006-8541-9610
Manish L BhaiyyaDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Shri. Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-3753
Meghana A HasamnisDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Shri. Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.
Madhusudan B KulkarniDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, KA, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-3784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient separation of blood plasma and Packed Cell Volume (PCV) is vital for rapid blood sensing and early disease detection, especially in point-of-care and resource-limited environments. Conventional centrifugation methods for separation are resource-intensive, time-consuming, and off-chip, necessitating innovative alternatives. This study introduces "Intelligent Microfluidics", an ML-integrated microfluidic platform designed to optimize plasma separation through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The trifurcation microchannel, modeled using COMSOL Multiphysics, achieved plasma yields of 90-95% across varying inflow velocities (0.0001-0.05 m/s). The input fluid parameters mimic the blood viscosity and density used with appropriate boundary conditions and fluid dynamics to optimize the designed microchannels. Eight supervised ML algorithms, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were employed to predict key performance parameters, with ANN achieving the highest predictive accuracy (R

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicrofluidicsPlasmaHumansHydrodynamicsNeural Networks, Computerblood plasma separationcomputational fluid dynamics (CFD)healthcare applicationintelligent microfluidicsmachine learningpacked cell volume (PCV)

Identifiers

PMID39996996
PMCPMC11852766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.