ReviewBiosensors2025
The Interpretation of Carbon Nanotubes' Electrochemistry: Electrocatalysis and Mass Transport Regime in the Apparent Promotion of Electron Transfer.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Electrochemical and Fluorescence Sensors for Propyl Gallate Monitoring in Food Samples.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Trends in developing nanoparticle-enhanced electrochemical sensors for neurotransmitter detection: a review.Biotechnologia · 2026Review
- Versatile bioanalytical platform based on carbon nanohorns functionalized with concanavalin A: an innovative strategy to develop electrochemical biosensors.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Carbon Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: Progress, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biosensors · 2025Review
- A Fundamental Study on a Porous Carbon Nanotubes Macroelectrode in Weakly Supported Electrolyte: A Novel Criterion for Distinguishing Diffusion Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely used in electrochemical sensors due to their significant impact on the electroanalytical signal. However, there remain significant doubts regarding the origin of the improved electroanalytical response observed in CNT-based sensors, particularly concerning the precise role of CNTs in these systems. In particular, the origin of the electrochemical response is controversial, as it may be due to either electrocatalytic or non-electrocatalytic processes. The latter implies that the electroanalytical response is mainly governed by the mass transport phenomena within the porous CNT layer. This article briefly reviews the several comprehensive models based on the role of porosity (diffusion in a 'thin-layer') on the electrochemical behavior as well as on the electrocatalytic properties of CNTs to resolve conflicts arising from misinterpretations of the electroanalytical response of CNT-based sensors. However, even though there are some explanations and conclusions on this topic, they seem to be valuable for specific electroactive species, the type of CNTs and/or electrode architecture, the electrode surface, etc. Accordingly, general theories and conclusions are not yet defined, so different approaches to this topic are still needed, since the main phenomenological effects responsible for the nature of the electrochemical response of the electrodes modified with CNTs need to be determined in a rational way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.