Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996990›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

The Interpretation of Carbon Nanotubes' Electrochemistry: Electrocatalysis and Mass Transport Regime in the Apparent Promotion of Electron Transfer.

Josipa Dugeč, Ivana Škugor Rončević, Nives Vladislavić, Josip Radić, Maša Buljac, Marijo Buzuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Josipa DugečDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0001-3107-2950
Ivana Škugor RončevićDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-8019
Nives VladislavićDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-6907
Josip RadićDepartment of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-4945
Maša BuljacDepartment of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-8904
Marijo BuzukDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-2764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely used in electrochemical sensors due to their significant impact on the electroanalytical signal. However, there remain significant doubts regarding the origin of the improved electroanalytical response observed in CNT-based sensors, particularly concerning the precise role of CNTs in these systems. In particular, the origin of the electrochemical response is controversial, as it may be due to either electrocatalytic or non-electrocatalytic processes. The latter implies that the electroanalytical response is mainly governed by the mass transport phenomena within the porous CNT layer. This article briefly reviews the several comprehensive models based on the role of porosity (diffusion in a 'thin-layer') on the electrochemical behavior as well as on the electrocatalytic properties of CNTs to resolve conflicts arising from misinterpretations of the electroanalytical response of CNT-based sensors. However, even though there are some explanations and conclusions on this topic, they seem to be valuable for specific electroactive species, the type of CNTs and/or electrode architecture, the electrode surface, etc. Accordingly, general theories and conclusions are not yet defined, so different approaches to this topic are still needed, since the main phenomenological effects responsible for the nature of the electrochemical response of the electrodes modified with CNTs need to be determined in a rational way.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesNanotubes, CarbonCatalysisElectrochemistryElectrodesElectron TransportPorosityNanotubes, Carbon(bio)sensorscarbon nanotubeschronoamperometrydiffusionelectrocatalysiselectrochemical impedance spectroscopyporositythin layervoltammetry

Identifiers

PMID39996990
PMCPMC11853170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.