ArticleBiosensors2025
Application of Wearable Insole Sensors in In-Place Running: Estimating Lower Limb Load Using Machine Learning.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency Clinical Decision for Sports Injury Management: A Wearable Sensor-Driven Framework from Training to Rehabilitation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Advances in flexible wearable pressure/strain sensors for motion monitoring in orthopaedic sports medicine.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Biomechanical Monitoring of Exercise Fatigue Using Wearable Devices: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal injuries induced by high-intensity and repetitive physical activities represent one of the primary health concerns in the fields of public fitness and sports. Musculoskeletal injuries, often resulting from unscientific training practices, are particularly prevalent, with the tibia being especially vulnerable to fatigue-related damage. Current tibial load monitoring methods rely mainly on laboratory equipment and wearable devices, but datasets combining both sources are limited due to experimental complexities and signal synchronization challenges. Moreover, wearable-based algorithms often fail to capture deep signal features, hindering early detection and prevention of tibial fatigue injuries. In this study, we simultaneously collected data from laboratory equipment and wearable insole sensors during in-place running by volunteers, creating a dataset named WearLab-Leg. Based on this dataset, we developed a machine learning model integrating Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) and Transformer modules to estimate vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and tibia bone force (TBF) using insole pressure signals. Our model's architecture effectively combines the advantages of local deep feature extraction and global modeling, and further introduces the Weight-MSELoss function to improve peak prediction performance. As a result, the model achieved a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 7.33% for vGRF prediction and 10.64% for TBF prediction. Our dataset and proposed model offer a convenient solution for biomechanical monitoring in athletes and patients, providing reliable data and technical support for early warnings of fatigue-induced injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.