Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996976›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

Dual Biomarker Strategies for Liquid Biopsy: Integrating Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA for Enhanced Tumor Monitoring.

Ga Young Moon, Basak Dalkiran, Hyun Sung Park, Dongjun Shin, Chaeyeon Son, Jung Hyun Choi, Seha Bang, Hosu Lee, Il Doh, Dong Hyung Kim and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ga Young MoonDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Basak DalkiranDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-422X
Hyun Sung ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Dongjun ShinDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-7666-6592
Chaeyeon SonDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hyun ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Seha BangDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Hosu LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Il DohDivision of Biomedical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, 267 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hyung KimDivision of Biomedical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, 267 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Jin JeongDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3775-9080
Jiyoon BuDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Inha University Inha research fundKorea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2025-00512449Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine RS-2024-00333403National Research Council of Science & Technology CRC22021-000 & GTL24021-000National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00416117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liquid biopsy has gained significant attention in cancer diagnostics, with circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) being recognized as key biomarkers for tumor detection and monitoring. However, each biomarker possesses inherent limitations that restrict its standalone clinical utility, such as the rarity and heterogeneity of CTCs and the variable sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA assays. This highlights the necessity of integrating both biomarkers to maximize diagnostic and prognostic potential, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the tumor biology and therapeutic response. In this review, we summarize clinical studies that have explored the combined analysis of CTCs and ctDNA as biomarkers, providing insights into their synergistic value in diverse tumor types. Specifically, this paper examines the individual advantages and limitations of CTCs and ctDNA, details the findings of combined biomarker studies across various cancers, highlights the benefits of dual biomarker approaches over single-biomarker strategies, and discusses future prospects for advancing personalized oncology through liquid biopsies. By offering a comprehensive overview of clinical studies combining CTCs and ctDNA, this review serves as a guideline for researchers and clinicians aiming to enhance biomarker-based strategies in oncology and informs biosensor design for improved biomarker detection.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiosensing TechniquesHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcirculating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)diagnostic biomarkerliquid biopsytumor diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39996976
PMCPMC11852634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.