ArticleDentistry journal2025
A Survey of Physicians' Knowledge and Practices Towards Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary care physicians and oral health care: competency gaps and opportunities for training.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral appliance therapy (OAT) is an effective treatment alternative for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Understanding physicians' knowledge and practices regarding OAT is crucial for improving OSA treatment, particularly in Southeast Asia, where there is limited research on this topic.
objectivesThis study sought to survey physicians' knowledge and practices regarding OAT for OSA treatment.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among Thai physicians attending the annual Sleep Society of Thailand meeting. The questionnaire included questions on demographics (six items), educational background (four items), OAT knowledge (two items), indications (three items), effectiveness (seven items), referral practices (five items), treatment planning (eight items), and the importance of OAT education (one item). Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SPSS to assess differences in knowledge and referral practices across various demographics.
resultsThis study achieved a response rate of 51.7% (30/58), with the respondents averaging 37.8 ± 6.0 years in age and 13.7 ± 6.7 years in practice. Although over 66.7% of the respondents recognized OAT's effectiveness and understood its indications, only 36.7% regularly prescribed OAT, and 57.7% referred patients to specific dentists. Knowledge and referral practices differed significantly based on years of practice and postgraduate training in sleep medicine. Physicians with 11-20 years of practice demonstrated higher pediatric OAT knowledge scores compared to those with less experience. Those with postgraduate training achieved higher adult OAT knowledge scores and had greater referral experience.
conclusionsDespite the general awareness and good knowledge of OAT among physicians, clinical use and referral rates remain low. To bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, it is recommended that postgraduate training in dental sleep medicine is promoted and further research is conducted to identify barriers to the adoption of OAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.