ArticleDentistry journal2025
Pathophysiological Responses of Oral Keratinocytes After Exposure to Flavored E-Cigarette Liquids.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vape flavoring chemicals and oral fibroblast viability.Anatomy & cell biology · 2026Review
- Polarization of THP-1-Derived Human M0 to M1 Macrophages Exposed to Flavored E-Liquids.Toxics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic cigarettes (ECIGs) have grown in popularity, particularly among adolescents and young adults. Flavored ECIG-liquids (E-liquids) are aerosolized by these ECIGs and inhaled into the respiratory system. Several studies have shown detrimental effects of E-liquids in airway tissues, revealing that flavoring agents may be the most irritating component. However, research on the effects of E-liquids on biological processes of the oral cavity, which is the first site of aerosol contact, is limited. Hence, this study focuses on the effects of E-liquid flavors on oral epithelial cells using the OKF6/TERT-2 cell line model. METHODOLOGY: E-liquid was prepared with and without flavors (tobacco, menthol, cinnamon, and strawberry). OKF6/TERT-2 oral epithelial cells, cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO
resultsExposure to 1% flavored E-liquids negatively affect cellular confluency, adherence, and morphology. E-liquids ± flavors, particularly cinnamon, increase oxidative stress and production of IL-8, curtail wound healing recovery, and decrease glycoprotein release. Gene expression of
conclusionsThis study suggests that ECIG use is not without risk. Flavored E-liquids, particularly cinnamon, result in pathophysiological responses of OKF6/TERT-2 cells. The dysregulation of inflammatory responses and cellular biology induced by E-liquids may contribute to various oral pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.