Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996904›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Management of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Grace Wu, Oliver J Standring, Daniel A King, Sepideh Gholami, Craig E Devoe, Cornelius A Thiels, Travis E Grotz, Matthew J Weiss, Richard L Whelan, Mustafa Raoof and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Grace WuNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-2768
Oliver J StandringNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Daniel A KingNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6451-712X
Sepideh GholamiNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Craig E DevoeNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Cornelius A ThielsDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-8601
Travis E GrotzDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-097X
Matthew J WeissNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Richard L WhelanNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Mustafa RaoofDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Danielle K DePeraltaNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-0124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peritoneum is the second most common site of metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Up to half of all patients that undergo curative-intent resection eventually develop peritoneal metastasis (PM), which accounts for significant morbidity and drives mortality. Despite recent advances in management, PM is associated with very poor prognosis, which is often measured in weeks to months. Clinical manifestations including bowel obstruction, ascites, and urinary obstruction have profound impact on quality of life. Even with relatively advanced disease, PM often remains occult on imaging and thus tend to be underdiagnosed and understudied. Many patients with peritoneal-only PM are excluded from clinical trials because response cannot be measured by standard radiographic criteria. Furthermore, as patients with PM are not eligible for surgical resection and low-volume peritoneal disease is often not amenable to percutaneous biopsy, tissue samples for peritoneal-specific translational studies are limited. Intraperitoneal therapeutics have been proposed as an attractive option for PM, as better penetration of tumor tissue can be achieved with less systemic toxicity compared with intravenous chemotherapy. Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), typically combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), is an option for select patients with PM from gynecologic or gastrointestinal primary, and for patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma. However, the incorporation of locoregional therapy for PM in patients with PDAC has been poorly studied given the aggressive nature of pancreatic cancer and overall poor prognosis. With recent advances in existing treatment options, there may be a subset of patients who may derive benefits from locoregional control with cytoreduction and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Critically, additional work is needed to determine PM-favorable clinical and tumoral predictive biomarkers to identify patients who may benefit from a more aggressive approach. We describe the current state of management of patients with peritoneal metastasis from PDAC and review the available data exploring peritoneal-directed therapy with cytoreductive surgery and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapycytoreductive surgery (CRS)heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)intraperitoneal chemotherapypancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)peritoneal metastasespressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC)

Identifiers

PMID39996904
PMCPMC11854847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.