Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996889›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Geriatric Oncology Clinic in Toronto, Canada.

Ines B Menjak, Khloe Campos, Mark Pasetka, Arlene Budden, Elaine Curle, Leslie Gibson, Ewa Szumacher, Rajin Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ines B MenjakDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Khloe CamposDepartment of Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Mark PasetkaDepartment of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Arlene BuddenDepartment of Nursing, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Elaine CurleDepartment of Nursing, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Leslie GibsonDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Ewa SzumacherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Rajin MehtaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults with cancer tend to face more complex health needs than their younger counterparts. Patients > 65 years of age are recommended for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to capture and address age-related vulnerabilities. Access to geriatrics services is limited, and our baseline audit of geriatric referrals in 2019 from the cancer program revealed that only 30% of patients referred received a CGA. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of a geriatric oncology (GO) clinic that employs CGA and determine patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single institution. Data collection included baseline characteristics, GO clinic findings and characteristics, recommendations/referrals, and emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalizations within 6 months of CGA. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. A total of 100 patients were included, with a median (range) age of 80 (63-97) years; 70% were female, and the most common cancer type was breast (31%). Through the GO clinic, patients were seen in a timely manner, with a median of 3 weeks, compared to our historical baseline of 11 weeks. Cognitive decline (32%) and pre-treatment CGA (22%) were the most common reasons for referral, and the most common new diagnosis was cognitive impairment (65%). For pre-treatment CGA, 16 (48%) patients were deemed suitable for treatment and 10 (30%) were recommended for modified treatment; 34 (94%) referring physicians followed the recommendation. In addition, most (68%) patients received an allied health referral. One third of patients visited the ER and 30 (30%) patients were hospitalized. Overall, the GO clinic resulted in greater access to CGA in a timely manner, enhanced access to allied health, and assisted in treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentGeriatricsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studiesallied healthdecision-makinggeriatricgeriatric assessmentgeriatric oncology cliniconcology

Identifiers

PMID39996889
PMCPMC11853954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.