Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996875›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Oligometastatic NSCLC: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.

Sara Torresan, Jacopo Costa, Carol Zanchetta, Lorenzo De Marchi, Simona Rizzato, Francesco Cortiula

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic Role ofCancers · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The Role of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms at the Arg399Gln Locus of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara TorresanDepartment of Medicine (DME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-2490-0556
Jacopo CostaDepartment of Medicine (DME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Carol ZanchettaDepartment of Medicine (DME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-1743-2989
Lorenzo De MarchiDepartment of Medicine (DME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-3585-9263
Simona RizzatoDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Francesco CortiulaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-3653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging patient survival. Most of the international consensus and guidelines agree on the need for shared criteria, such as appropriate stadiation and even tissue biopsy if needed, in order to select patients that could really benefit from personalised strategies. Multidisciplinary evaluation is crucial in order to define if every lesion is amenable to radical local treatment, which appears to be the most important criterion across different guidelines. A distinction must be made depending on the time of oligo-disease detection, separating de novo oligometastatic disease from oligorecurrence, oligoprogression and oligoresidual disease. These separate entities imply a different biology and prognosis, and treatment strategies consequently must be tailored. Locoregional approaches are therefore often contemplated in order to ensure the best outcome for the patient. In non-oncogene-addicted disease, the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) allows physicians to take into consideration consolidative treatments, but timing, technique and subsequent systemic treatment remain open issues. In oncogene-addicted NSCLC, local treatments are nowadays preferably reserved to cases of oligoprogression, but the advent of new, more potent drugs might challenge that. In this review, we summarised the current knowledge, consensuses and data from retrospective and prospective trials, with the aim of shedding some light on the topic and emphasising the unmet clinical need.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisnon-oncogene-addicted NSCLCNSCLColigometastaticoligoprogressiveoncogene-addicted NSCLC

Identifiers

PMID39996875
PMCPMC11854464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.