Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996818›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

Screening of the Antimelanoma Activity of Monoterpenes-In Vitro Experiments on Four Human Melanoma Lines.

Paula Wróblewska-Łuczka, Laura Kulenty, Katarzyna Załuska-Ogryzek, Agnieszka Góralczyk, Jarogniew J Łuszczki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula Wróblewska-ŁuczkaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-1968
Laura KulentyDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Załuska-OgryzekDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-8889
Agnieszka GóralczykDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-1051
Jarogniew J ŁuszczkiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-0393

Funding

Medical University of Lublin DS 474/2020-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive type of malignant tumor caused by a dysfunction of melanocytes. Despite progress in the treatment of melanoma, further research and search for new potential drugs are necessary to optimize the therapy. (2) The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiproliferative activity of eight selected monoterpenes by MTT and LDH assays on four malignant melanoma cell lines. (3) Myrcene, rhodinol and nerol did not show any significant anticancer effect on melanoma cell lines, but citral, carvacrol, citronellol, thymol and geraniol showed a significant anti-viability effect. Our studies have shown that the most effective terpene among those tested in inhibiting melanoma cell viability was carvacrol, with the lowest IC50 in the range of 0.05 ± 0.00 to 0.06 ± 0.01 mM. Moreover, it did not negatively affect normal human keratinocyte cells. (4) Metastatic melanoma is very difficult to treat, and some terpenes have the ability to sensitize cells to other chemicals; so, it is worth investigating their antimelanoma potential, as terpenes could become an adjuvant to traditional treatment.

Indexed as

carvacrolcitralcitronellolgeraniolmelanomamonoterpenesmyrcenenerolrhodinolthymol

Identifiers

PMID39996818
PMCPMC11854273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.