ArticleCells2025
Establishing Minimum Criteria for Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth (SHEDs) Cultured in Human Platelet Lysate (hPL)-Contained Media as Cell Therapy Candidates: Characterization and Predictive Analysis of Secretome Effects.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Update Regarding the Use of Contemporary Dental Materials in Periodontal Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SHEDs have demonstrated significant potential in cell therapy due to their superior proliferation rate, self-renewal and differentiation capacity (particularly neurogenesis attributed to their neural crest origin), and the less invasive procedure required for tissue collection compared to other stem cells. However, there is no established criterion to verify the minimum qualification to select one from numerous candidates, especially for SHEDs' cultured FBS-free medium for clinic application. For that, we performed a characteristic analysis containing the growth rate, colony-forming unit (CFU) number, average colony size, and migration capacity with hPL-cultured SHEDs from 21 different donors, and we suggest the result as a minimum standard to filter out unqualified candidates. In addition, in the secretome analysis to predict the paracrine effect, it was found that upregulated proteins compared to the control were related to angiogenesis, immune response, and BMP signaling, and this was found to have a strong correlation only with protein concentration. This study presents a minimum standard for selecting cell therapy candidates and suggests the protein concentration of a conditioned medium as a cost-effective tool to expect the paracrine effect of SHEDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.