Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996669›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Hydrogels for Peripheral Nerve Repair: Emerging Materials and Therapeutic Applications.

Oana Taisescu, Venera Cristina Dinescu, Alexandra Daniela Rotaru-Zavaleanu, Andrei Gresita, Michael Hadjiargyrou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oana TaisescuDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2-4 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Venera Cristina DinescuDepartment of Health Promotion and Occupational Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2-4 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Alexandra Daniela Rotaru-ZavaleanuDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2-4 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Andrei GresitaExperimental Research Centre for Normal and Pathological Aging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Michael HadjiargyrouDepartment of Biological & Chemical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8927-2333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries pose a significant clinical challenge due to the complex biological processes involved in nerve repair and their limited regenerative capacity. Despite advances in surgical techniques, conventional treatments, such as nerve autografts, are faced with limitations like donor site morbidity and inconsistent functional outcomes. As such, there is a growing interest in new, novel, and innovative strategies to enhance nerve regeneration. Tissue engineering/regenerative medicine and its use of biomaterials is an emerging example of an innovative strategy. Within the realm of tissue engineering, functionalized hydrogels have gained considerable attention due to their ability to mimic the extracellular matrix, support cell growth and differentiation, and even deliver bioactive molecules that can promote nerve repair. These hydrogels can be engineered to incorporate growth factors, bioactive peptides, and stem cells, creating a conducive microenvironment for cellular growth and axonal regeneration. Recent advancements in materials as well as cell biology have led to the development of sophisticated hydrogel systems, that not only provide structural support, but also actively modulate inflammation, promote cell recruitment, and stimulate neurogenesis. This review explores the potential of functionalized hydrogels for peripheral nerve repair, highlighting their composition, biofunctionalization, and mechanisms of action. A comprehensive analysis of preclinical studies provides insights into the efficacy of these hydrogels in promoting axonal growth, neuronal survival, nerve regeneration, and, ultimately, functional recovery. Thus, this review aims to illuminate the promise of functionalized hydrogels as a transformative tool in the field of peripheral nerve regeneration, bridging the gap between biological complexity and clinical feasibility.

Indexed as

axonal growthbioactive moleculesfunctionalized hydrogelsinflammation modulationnerve regenerationneuronal survivalperipheral nerve injurytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39996669
PMCPMC11855328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.