ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Construction of a 'Simple, Fast and Accurate' Evaluation Method for Profile Control and Plugging Effect of Gel Plugging Agent Based on Simulations.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A High-Temperature-Resistant Nanogel for Profile Control and Water Shutoff in Deep Low-Permeability Reservoirs: Performance and Mechanism Study.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Dynamic Simulation of Nano-Gel Microspheres for Plugging Preferential Flow Channels and Enhancing Oil Recovery in Waterflooded Reservoirs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At present, the evaluation perspective of the gel plugging agent assessment method is incomprehensive, due to which the experimental results deviate from the field data. By analyzing the current indoor evaluation methods and the factors controlling the sealing capability of gel plugging agents, an experimental device and method for evaluating the blocking effect of oilfield gel plugging agents has been designed. In contrast to traditional assessment methods, the proposed approach offers advantages such as simple operation, rapid experimentation, and accurate results. The experimental results show that gels selected using conventional methods are inconsistent with the results of plugging displacement tests. This discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that these methods focus solely on cohesive strength while neglecting adhesive strength. Considering that the evaluation perspective of conventional methods is relatively limited, an evaluation method for the sealing effect of the plugging agent was developed. This method comprehensively incorporates factors such as cohesion strength, adhesion capability, shear resistance, and the long-term anti-dehydration performance of the gel. The evaluation results of the method were consistent with the results of the plugging displacement experiments. The newly constructed method defines
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.