Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996653›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Bioprinting-By-Design of Hydrogel-Based Biomaterials for In Situ Skin Tissue Engineering.

Alisa Douglas, Yufei Chen, Margarita Elloso, Adam Levschuk, Marc G Jeschke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alisa DouglasDepartment of School of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Yufei ChenDavid Braley Research Institute, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.
Margarita EllosoHamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON L8L 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-2236
Adam LevschukSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada.
Marc G JeschkeDepartment of School of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-1664

Funding

Juravinski Research Institute NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are one of the most common trauma injuries worldwide and have detrimental effects on the entire body. However, the current standard of care is autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSGs), which induces additional injuries to the patient. Therefore, the development of alternative treatments to replace traditional STSGs is critical, and bioprinting could be the future of burn care. Specifically, in situ bioprinting offers several advantages in clinical applications compared to conventional in vitro bioprinting, primarily due to its ability to deposit bioink directly onto the wound. This review provides an in-depth discussion of the aspects involved in in situ bioprinting for skin regeneration, including crosslinking mechanisms, properties of natural and synthetic hydrogel-based bioinks, various in situ bioprinting methods, and the clinical translation of in situ bioprinting. The current limitations of in situ bioprinting is the ideal combination of bioink and printing mechanism to allow multi-material dispensing or to produce well-orchestrated constructs in a timely manner in clinical settings. However, extensive ongoing research is focused on addressing these challenges, and they do not diminish the significant potential of in situ bioprinting for skin regeneration.

Indexed as

bioinkbiomaterialsbioprintingburnshydrogelin situskin regenerationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39996653
PMCPMC11854875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.