Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996650›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Bacterial Cellulose/Alginate-Based Hydrogel and Frog Skin Dressings in Equine Skin Wound Healing.

Rita C Campebell, Andressa B Oliveira, Jéssyca L A Fagundes, Beatriz N A Fortes, Henrique C Veado, Isabel L Macedo, Bruno S L Dallago, Hernane S Barud, José Adorno, Pablo A V Salvador and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of tilapia skin (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rita C CampebellHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8225-065X
Andressa B OliveiraHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.
Jéssyca L A FagundesHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.
Beatriz N A FortesHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.
Henrique C VeadoHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-5375
Isabel L MacedoHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7327-9143
Bruno S L DallagoHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4883-1076
Hernane S BarudLaboratório de Biopolímeros e Biomateriais (BIOPOLMAT), Departamento de Química, Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA), Araraquara 14800-000, SP, Brazil.
José AdornoAsa Norte Regional Hospital, HRAN, SMHN Q2, Asa Norte, Brasília 70710-100, DF, Brazil.
Pablo A V SalvadorRadiation Technology Center, CETER-IPEN-CNEN/SP, Sao Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-1626
Paulo S SantosRadiation Technology Center, CETER-IPEN-CNEN/SP, Sao Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil.
Márcio B CastroHospital Escola de Grandes Animais, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária (FAV), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Área Especial SRB, Galpão 4, Granja do Torto 70636-200, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-0856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the wound-healing process in horses following the application of two treatment modalities: bacterial cellulose hydrogel with alginate (BCAW) and frog skin (FSW) dressings on experimentally induced skin wounds. Throughout the experiment, no clinical abnormalities were noted in the horses, although initial wound assessments indicated edema and sensitivity. Local hemorrhage was observed in some cases on Day 0, with granulation tissue formation evident by Day 14. Epithelialization began around Day 14 but did not reach complete healing in any group by Day 28. The analysis showed no significant differences in skin wound area or wound contraction rates among the treatment groups compared to control wounds (CWs) over the evaluation periods. Histopathological evaluations also indicated no significant differences in inflammatory responses or healing markers, such as fibroblast proliferation and neovascularization in skin wounds across groups. Despite expectations based on prior research in other species, the treatments with BCAW and FSW did not demonstrate substantial pro-healing effects in horses with induced skin wounds. These findings underscore the complexity of equine wound healing and suggest further investigation is needed to optimize treatment strategies in this species and enhance the translational potential for human clinical applications.

Indexed as

bacterial cellulosefrog skinhorseshydrogeltissue regenerationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID39996650
PMCPMC11854820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.