Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996525›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Integrating data to assess occupancy patterns of an endangered bumble bee.

Kristen S Ellis, Clint R V Otto, Larissa L Bailey, Tamara A Smith, Steven Choy, Lauren Hatch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrating data to assess occupancy patterns of an endangered bumble bee.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen S EllisNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2759-3670
Clint R V OttoNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-3525
Larissa L BaileyDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Tamara A SmithMinnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-0254
Steven ChoyMinnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Lauren HatchDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Great Lakes Restoration InitiativeMidwest Climate Adaptation Science CenterUSGS/USFWS Science Support Partnership
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in integrating community science data with structured monitoring data to estimate changes in distribution patterns of imperiled species, including pollinators. However, significant challenges remain in determining how unstructured community science data should be incorporated into formal analyses of species distributions. We developed a dynamic framework for combining community science and structured monitoring data of bumble bees to estimate changes in occupancy of rusty-patched bumble bees (Bombus affinis), a federally endangered species in the United States. We applied traditional metapopulation theory and accounted for imperfect detection to estimate site-specific extirpation risk and colonization rates across the known distribution of B. affinis in the Upper Midwest (USA). Despite a 144% increase in presence-only detections from 2017 to 2022, occupancy probabilities and the estimated number of occupied sites remained static or declined slightly across a 4-state region during this period. Our results provide preliminary evidence that the probability of local extirpation risk of B. affinis increased in response to drought, but that effect was tempered with a high number of neighboring patches occupied by B. affinis (i.e., rescue effect). Our framework can be used by managers to track population recovery goals for B. affinis and other bumble bees of conservation concern. In addition, our study highlights the importance of accounting for imperfect detection and addressing spatial sampling biases in bumble bee monitoring efforts, particularly those for which a portion of the monitoring data are generated from community science projects.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesAnimalsBeesPopulation Dynamicsautologistic modelbee conservationconservación de abejasdeclinación de polinizadoresdinámica de ocupacióndinámicas metapoblacionalesdynamic occupancyextirpation riskmetapopulation dynamicsmodelo autologísticopollinator declineriesgo de extirpación

Identifiers

PMID39996525
PMCPMC12309646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.