Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996416›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Multifactorial construction of low-grade and high-grade endometrial cancer recurrence prediction models.

Yachai Li, Jia Yan, Yuanmei Deng, Peixuan Wang, Xue Bai, Wei Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prognostic Role of L1CAM in Endometrial Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Multifactorial construction of low-grade and high-grade endometrial cancer recurrence prediction models.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yachai LiDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Heibei University, Baoding, China.
Jia YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Yuanmei DengHebei University, Baoding, China.
Peixuan WangHebei University, Baoding, China.
Xue BaiHebei University, Baoding, China.
Wei QinDepartment of Integrative Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Heibei University, Baoding, China.

Funding

2023 Medical Science Research Project Plan of Hebei Provincial Health Commission 20230205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze independent risk factors for endometrial cancer (EC), a common female cancer globally, and construct individualized prediction models for EC recurrence.

methodsThe EC patients from the medical record system were divided into low-grade (n = 392) and high-grade (n = 183) groups. Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor, progestin receptor, Ki67, and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) was detected. Univariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, and stepwise Cox regression were applied for identifying independent risk factors for EC recurrence. The predictive value of the model was verified by using receiver operating characteristics curves, bootstrap method, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis curves.

resultsMultivariate Cox analysis revealed that FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics) Stage, progestin receptor, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and tumor size were independent risk factors for low-grade EC recurrence-free survival (RFS), and FIGO Stage, L1CAM, LVSI, and pelvic lymph node status were independent risk factors for high-grade EC. The areas under the curves at 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS in low-grade and high-grade groups were 0.881/0.825, 0.888/0.853, and 0.807/0.832, respectively. Calibration curves were close to the diagonal, and the decision curve analysis curves were located mostly above the All and None lines in both groups.

conclusionThe prediction model demonstrates accurate discriminative ability and strong calibration capability. It has high clinical application value and provides decision making information regarding RFS for both low-grade and high-grade EC patients. This may assist in formulating personalized treatment plans, monitoring follow-up strategies, and implementing lifestyle intervention measures.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1PrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneKi-67 AntigenNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteroneendometrial cancerimmunohistochemical markersnomogramprediction modelrecurrence‐free survival

Identifiers

PMID39996416
PMCPMC12255920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.