Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996386›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Patient Perception of Involvement in Nursing Bedside Handover: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Manonita Ghosh, Kaoru Nosaka, Rosemary Saunders, Olivia Gallagher, Amanda Towell-Barnard, Debannita Ghosh, Lucy Gent, Linda Coventry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manonita GhoshSocial Ageing Future Lab, School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-1959
Kaoru NosakaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Rosemary SaundersSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-4694
Olivia GallagherSchool of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-0039
Amanda Towell-BarnardSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2475-7724
Debannita GhoshSocial Ageing Future Lab, School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Lucy GentCentre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Linda CoventrySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-9942

Funding

Charlies Foundation for Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group (SCGOPHCG)Government of Western Australia, Department of Health (MRGP21-22-08)School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University (SAH-RAS2023)School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, aligned to safety and quality standards, the health system implements standardised practices that include patient involvement in nursing bedside handover. Despite this mandate, it remains unclear whether patients are genuinely participating in nursing bedside handovers and whether their perspectives are being considered.

aimTo explore patient perceptions of their involvement in nursing bedside handovers.

methodsA cross-sectional survey study was conducted in two acute metropolitan hospitals in Western Australia from July 2021 to March 2022. The survey administered to patients, comprised three sections: demographic information; involvement in bedside handover; and perceptions of bedside handovers; utilising close-ended and Likert scale questions. Open-ended questions further explored participation in bedside handovers. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses were performed and responses to open-ended questions underwent summative deductive content analysis.

resultsOf the 390 participants, over half reported five or more bedside handovers (n = 197, 50.7%). Most perceived the importance of (n = 334, 79.0%), and expressed their satisfaction with (n = 327, 89.6%), involvement in bedside handover. Perceptions of handover were mostly positive. There were a few significant differences throughout based on type of hospital, gender and age-group. Open ended responses shared perceptions on the perceived benefits, challenges and barriers and ways to enhance involvement in bedside handover. Patients expressed several challenges, including lack of awareness of their right to participate, the approach of nurses and the timing of handovers as hindering their participation in bedside handovers.

conclusionPatients perceived the importance of, were mostly satisfied with, and had positive perceptions of bedside handover. However, several challenges hindered effective patient participation. Further research is needed into bedside handover as it is essential to enhance patient-centred quality care that aligns with national safety and quality healthcare standards. IMPACTS: Understanding the significance of patient involvement in bedside handovers motivates patients to actively share information about their care, leading to increased patient satisfaction and the promotion of patient-centred care. Addressing challenges through targeted strategies can enhance patient participation, communication, increased patient satisfaction and foster a more patient-centred approach to care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The conduct of this study was supported by the consumer advisory group in the participating hospitals who also reviewed the survey questionnaires and conducted face validity of the survey.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPatient HandoffPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWestern AustraliaYoung Adultcross‐sectional designhealth services researchhospitalnurse–patient interactionnursing bedside handoverpatient‐centred carepatient participationpatient perspectives

Identifiers

PMID39996386
PMCPMC12623694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.