ArticleCureus2025
A Case of the Utility of Viscoelastic Testing for the Management of the Impella Device in Heparin Anticoagulation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main anticoagulant therapy with Impella is unfractionated heparin (UFH), with manufacturers recommending a target therapeutic range of 160-180 seconds for activated clotting time (ACT). However, the ACT assay does not have uniform criteria, and many available devices contain a variety of activators, making it difficult to compare them individually. We used Impella CP in the perioperative management of a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture in a 69-year-old man. A significant amount of UHF was used in this case, but as the ACT did not reach the recommended range, blood viscoelasticity testing (VET) was adopted as an alternative point-of-care test (POCT). The initial measurement results showed a clot time (CT) of 308 seconds, a heparinase clot time (CTH) of 161 seconds, and a clot time ratio (CTR) of 1.9, indicating that UFH was sufficiently active. Continuous administration of UFH was then performed with reference to VET, which was terminated three hours before surgery. As an alternative POCT to ACT, the VET may be suitable for assessing low doses of UFH effectiveness with heparinase assay, which provides specific measures of the heparin effect, such as CTR, and minimizes the variability in results as compared to ACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.