Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996207›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case of the Utility of Viscoelastic Testing for the Management of the Impella Device in Heparin Anticoagulation.

Satoshi Kometani, Eri Watanabe, Tomohide Takei, Mimiko Tabata

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Satoshi KometaniAnesthesiology, Yamato Seiwa Hospital, Yamato, JPN.
Eri WatanabeAnesthesiology, Yamato Seiwa Hospital, Yamato, JPN.
Tomohide TakeiAnesthesiology, Yamato Seiwa Hospital, Yamato, JPN.
Mimiko TabataCardiovascular Surgery, Yamato Seiwa Hospital, Yamato, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main anticoagulant therapy with Impella is unfractionated heparin (UFH), with manufacturers recommending a target therapeutic range of 160-180 seconds for activated clotting time (ACT). However, the ACT assay does not have uniform criteria, and many available devices contain a variety of activators, making it difficult to compare them individually. We used Impella CP in the perioperative management of a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture in a 69-year-old man. A significant amount of UHF was used in this case, but as the ACT did not reach the recommended range, blood viscoelasticity testing (VET) was adopted as an alternative point-of-care test (POCT). The initial measurement results showed a clot time (CT) of 308 seconds, a heparinase clot time (CTH) of 161 seconds, and a clot time ratio (CTR) of 1.9, indicating that UFH was sufficiently active. Continuous administration of UFH was then performed with reference to VET, which was terminated three hours before surgery. As an alternative POCT to ACT, the VET may be suitable for assessing low doses of UFH effectiveness with heparinase assay, which provides specific measures of the heparin effect, such as CTR, and minimizes the variability in results as compared to ACT.

Indexed as

activated clotting timeheparin administrationimpella devicepoint-of-care viscoelastic testingunfractionated heparin (ufh)

Identifiers

PMID39996207
PMCPMC11848697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.