ArticleCureus2025
Timing and Patterns of Potentially Salvageable Recurrences Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Assessed by Preferential Amino Acid Uptake.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose18F-fluciclovine is a radiolabeled amino acid analog that is preferentially taken up by prostate cancer cells. 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT scans are approved for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly offered for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Limited data exist on the patterns of failure following prostate SBRT. The impact of scan timing before or after meeting the Phoenix criteria is unknown. Here, we characterize 18F-fluciclovine-defined recurrences for patients with rising prostate-specific antigens (PSAs) following SBRT.
methodsBetween 2017 and 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent an 18F-fluciclovine scan for suspected recurrence. All patients were treated on an institutional protocol with either SBRT (35-36.25 Gy) or SBRT boost (19.5 Gy) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A total of 38% of the patients were high-risk, and 46% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as part of their initial treatment. Patterns of failure were classified as PSA-only, local (prostate), lymph node (LN), bone, visceral, or combined. Patients were considered salvageable if all evidence of disease could be safely treated with local therapy (radiation, surgery, or interventional radiology (IR) ablation).
resultsThe median time from treatment was 39 months, and the median pre-scan PSA was 2.8 ng/mL. The overall scan positivity rate in our cohort was 34/51 (67%). The most common sites for initial disease recurrence were the prostate (22%), pelvic and para-aortic lymph node basins (40%), and bone (6%). A total of 21/51 scans (41%) were performed prior to reaching the Phoenix definition (nadir + 2) at a median PSA of 1.14 ng/mL. Of these patients, 12 (57%) had evidence of disease recurrence, all of which were potentially salvageable local or LN recurrences. The remaining 30/51 (59%) scans were performed after meeting the Phoenix definition (median PSA = 5.65 ng/mL). Of these, 22/30 (73%) had disease recurrence and 82% were potentially salvageable.
conclusionsThe diagnosis and management of recurrence following prostate SBRT continues to evolve. Approximately 50% of patients in our cohort who had yet to meet the Phoenix definition had scan evidence of disease recurrence, all of which were potentially salvageable with additional local therapy. Additional research is needed to identify factors predictive of disease recurrence on 18F-fluciclovine scans prior to reaching the Phoenix definition when they may be most curable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.