ReviewCureus2025
Adolescent Clavicle Fractures: A Management Dilemma?
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Operative Treatment of Adolescent Diaphyseal Clavicle Fracture: Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail Versus Plate Fixation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clavicle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries in adolescents, particularly male athletes, arising primarily from sports-related trauma and vehicular accidents. While non-operative treatment remains the standard approach due to favourable recovery outcomes and lower complication rates, the trend toward surgical fixation has gained traction, driven by emerging studies suggesting potential benefits in certain cases. This review critically examines the indications, outcomes, and complications associated with both conservative and operative management of adolescent clavicle fractures. Non-operative treatment demonstrates high healing rates, minimal long-term functional deficits, and excellent patient satisfaction. Conversely, operative interventions, including plate fixation and intramedullary nailing, are associated with improved alignment in displaced fractures but carry risks of hardware-related complications, such as implant irritation, hardware failure, and the necessity for removal surgeries. The role of surgical intervention remains controversial, with no definitive consensus or Level 1 evidence favouring one approach over the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.