ReviewBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2025
The effect of neighbouring group participation and possible long range remote group participation in
Review in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Synthesis and Immunological Evaluation of Escherichia coli O29, Shigella dysenteriae Serotype 11, and Proteus vulgaris O12 O-Antigen Oligosaccharides.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Novel sugar-conjugated Knoevenagel condensate curcumin derivatives as promising bioactive hybrids with antimalarial potential.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Evaluating Participation Modes in Peracetylated Glycosyl Cations.Organic letters · 2026Article
- Elucidating the Stereodirecting Effect of C-4 Acyl Groups on Galactosyl Donors.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Polytetrafluoroethylene-Assisted Rapid Preparation of α‑Oligomannosides Containing Mannose-6-Phosphate Residues.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereoselective glycosylations are one of the most challenging tasks of synthetic glycochemists. The protecting building blocks on the glycosides contribute significantly in attaining the required stereochemistry of the resulting glycosides. Strategic installation of suitable protecting groups in the C-2 position, vicinal to the anomeric carbon, renders neighbouring group participation, whereas protecting groups in the distal C-3, C-4, and C-6 positions are often claimed to exhibit remote group participation with the anomeric carbon. Neighbouring group participation and remote group participation are being widely studied to help the glycochemists design the synthetic protocols for multistep synthesis of complex oligosaccharides and in turn, standardise the process of the glycosylation towards a particular stereochemical output. While neighbouring group participation has been quite effective in achieving the required stereochemistry of the produced glycosides, remote participation exhibits comparatively less efficacy in achieving complete stereoselectivity in the glycosylation reactions. Remote participation is a still highly debated topic in the scientific community. However, implementing the participating role of the remote groups in glycosylation reactions is widely practised to achieve better stereocontrol and to facilitate the formation of synthetically challenging glycosidic linkages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.