Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996164›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2025

Gradient-Based Radiomics for Outcome Prediction and Decision-Making in PULSAR: A Preliminary Study.

Haozhao Zhang, Jiaqi Liu, Michael Dohopolski, Zabi Wardak, Robert Timmerman, Hao Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haozhao ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jiaqi LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Michael DohopolskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Zabi WardakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Robert TimmermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Hao PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Personalized ultrafractionated stereotactic adaptive radiation therapy (PULSAR) has emerged as an innovative method for delivering high-dose radiation over extended intervals, adapting treatment based on the patient's response. However, current adaptation largely relies on physicians' experience and tumor size assessment, underscoring the need for a data-driven approach to improve outcome prediction and support decision-making. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 69 lesions from 39 patients undergoing PULSAR treatment. Gradient-based features, including gradient magnitude, radial gradient, and radial deviation, were extracted from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions, with the latter further divided into octant subregions. Support vector machine models were developed using features from first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), second MRI, and delta mode (change between the 2). An ensemble feature selection (EFS) model was then created by combining the features of the top-performing individual models. The approach was validated on a non-PULSAR cohort (37 lesions from 23 patients) treated with standard fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. Results: The EFS model shows strong predictive performance in determining whether tumor volume reduction exceeds 20% at the 3-month postradiation time point. Features derived from octant subregions exhibit significantly better prediction than those from the core or entire margin. Pretreatment features (from first MRI) generally outperform second MRI and delta-mode features, while the inclusion of 1 delta feature in the EFS model enhances performance. In the non-PULSAR cohort, the gradient-based approach outperforms conventional radiomics, demonstrating its strong generalizability. Conclusion: Our gradient-based radiomics approach, combining spatial segmentation and temporal features, significantly enhances treatment response prediction in PULSAR therapy. Its superior performance compared to conventional radiomics, coupled with its effectiveness in both PULSAR and non-PULSAR cohorts, highlights its potential as a robust tool for personalized treatment planning in neuro-oncology, applicable to both photon and particle therapies.

Indexed as

Brain metastasisFeature selectionOutcome predictionPULSARRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39996164
PMCPMC11848104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.