Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996117›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Optimizing the selection of quantitative traits in plant breeding using simulation.

Rafael Augusto Vieira, Ana Paula Oliveira Nogueira, Roberto Fritsche-Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafael Augusto VieiraDepartment of Research & Development, Crop Science - Breeding, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Ana Paula Oliveira NogueiraInstitute of Biotechnology, Graduate Program in Genetics & Biochemistry and Graduate Program in Agronomy, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoDepartment of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes findings from simulation studies on quantitative traits in plant breeding and translates these insights into practical schemes. As agricultural productivity faces growing challenges, plant breeding is central to addressing these issues. Simulations use mathematical models to replicate biological conditions, bridging theory and practice by validating hypotheses early and optimizing genetic gain and resource use. While strategies can improve trait value, they reduce genetic diversity, making a combination of approaches essential. Studies emphasize the importance of aligning strategy with trait heritability and selection timing and maintaining genetic diversity while considering genotype-environment interactions to avoid biases in early selection. Using markers accelerates breeding cycles when marker placement is precise, foreground and background selection are balanced, and QTL are effectively managed. Genomic selection increases genetic gains by shortening breeding cycles and improving parent selection, especially for low heritability traits and complex genetic architectures. Regular updates of training sets are critical, regardless of genetic architecture. Bayesian methods perform well with fewer genes and in early breeding cycles, while BLUP is more robust for traits with many QTL, and RR-BLUP proves flexible across different conditions. Larger populations lead to greater gains when clear objectives and adequate germplasm are available. Accuracy declines over generations, influenced by genetic architecture and population size. For low heritability traits, multi-trait analysis improves accuracy, especially when correlated with high heritability traits. Updates including top-performing candidates, but conserving variability enhances gains and accuracy. Low-density genotyping and imputation offer cost-effective alternatives to high-density genotyping, achieving comparable results. Targeting populations optimizes genetic relationships, further improving accuracy and breeding outcomes. Evaluating genomic selection reveals a balance between short-term gains and long-term potential and rapid-cycling genomic programs excel. Diverse approaches preserve rare alleles, achieve significant gains, and maintain diversity, highlighting the trade-offs in optimizing breeding success.

Indexed as

breeding methodsbreeding optimizationgenetic diversitygenetic gaingenomic selectionprediction accuracyselection responsesimulation

Identifiers

PMID39996117
PMCPMC11847808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.