ArticleMethodsX2025
Sustainability decision-making in poultry slaughterhouses: A comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chicken meat industry is vital for global food security and economic growth but faces significant sustainability challenges, especially in balancing economic, environmental, and social aspects. Addressing these challenges in chicken slaughterhouses (CSH) in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, is crucial. This study aims to prioritize criteria for developing strategies to enhance CSH sustainability by comparing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) using different fuzzy numbers. The findings emphasize the need for a strategy that merges stakeholder engagement, technological innovation, and circular economy principles to advance sustainability. This study fills a research gap by applying multi-criteria decision-making in the poultry industry, which provides a deeper understanding of the robustness and sensitivity of sustainability assessments.•Employing AHP and Fuzzy AHP with different fuzzy numbers enriches sustainability evaluations by balancing precise judgments and expert uncertainties, which enhancing assessment robustness in the poultry industry.•Hygiene and sanitation, market competitiveness, and waste minimization are the three highest priorities for sustainable CSH operations across scenarios.•These findings highlight the need for strategies that integrate stakeholder engagement, innovation, and circular economy principles, addressing a gap in decision-making research for the poultry industry in developing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.