ArticleMethodsX2025
From lab to real-life: A three-stage validation of wearable technology for stress monitoring.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Use of Consumer Wearable Devices and Digital Tools for Stress Measurement in College Students: Scoping Review of Methods.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Mental Stress Detection Using Physiological Sensors and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Contingencies of Stress in University Students: A Systematic Scoping Review of Stress Mediators and Moderators.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integration of Multi-Modal Biosensing Approaches for Depression: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sport and health science: interdisciplinary approaches to modern challenges.British medical bulletin · 2025Article
- Advancements in Wearable and Implantable BioMEMS Devices: Transforming Healthcare Through Technology.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress negatively impacts health, contributing to hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and immune dysfunction. While conventional diagnostic methods, such as self-reported questionnaires and basic physiological measurements, often lack the objectivity and precision needed for effective stress management, wearable devices present a promising avenue for early stress detection and management. This study conducts a three-stage validation of wearable technology for stress monitoring, transitioning from controlled experimental data to real-life scenarios. Using the controlled WESAD dataset, binary and five-class classification models were developed, achieving maximum accuracies of 99.78 %±0.15 % and 99.61 %±0.32 %, respectively. Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), and Respiration (RESP) were identified as reliable stress biomarkers. Validation was extended to the SWEET dataset, representing real-life data, to confirm generalizability and practical applicability. Furthermore, commercially available wearables supporting these modalities were reviewed, providing recommendations for optimal configurations in dynamic, real-world conditions. These findings demonstrate the potential of multimodal wearable devices to bridge the gap between controlled studies and practical applications, advancing early stress detection systems and personalized stress management strategies.•Stress detection methods were validated using multimodal wearable data in controlled (WESAD) and real-life (SWEET) datasets.•Commercial wearable technologies were reviewed, offering insights into their applicability for practical stress monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.