ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Access to Diagnostics and Treatment for People With Metastatic EGFR-Positive NSCLC: Lessons From Project PRIORITY.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment landscape for people diagnosed with EGFR-mutated (EGFR-m) NSCLC has rapidly evolved, yet there remains limited self-reported information about the lived experience. In this paper, we describe the clinical characteristics and treatment experiences of people living with EGFR-m lung cancer from Project PRIORITY, a patient-driven study. Methods: An online survey was distributed among the EGFR Resisters community between April 2019 and January 2020. The survey captured participants' demographics and lung cancer risk factors, diagnostic and treatment pathways, and prevalence of side effects. Descriptive statistics were used and included subgroups based on residency and cancer stage. Results: Of the 425 participants, most were female (67%), under 60 years old (53%), and resided in the United States (74%). The most frequently reported symptom at diagnosis was cough (54%), though 18% reported no symptoms. In addition, 89% reported receiving at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); osimertinib was the most prescribed first-line TKI for stage IV participants diagnosed after 2017. Participants residing in the United States were more likely to have access to advanced diagnostic (next-generating sequencing) and newer treatments such as osimertinib. Just under half of the sample (47%) had experienced progressive disease and were no longer on first-line treatment. Conclusion: The TKI era has been practice changing; however, little is understood from the perspective of people living with EGFR-m NSCLC. This paper is the first to explore this and found it is possible to have people self-report complex health information about their lung cancer. In addition, although most participants were diagnosed after osimertinib became guideline-recommended treatment, disparities in treatment were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.