Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39996017›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2025

Optimizing the accession-level quantity of seeds to put into storage to minimize seed (gene)bank regeneration or re-collection.

Fiona R Hay, Katherine J Baum Née Whitehouse, Olaniyi Oyatomi, Dustin Wolkis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona R HayDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3118-897X
Katherine J Baum Née WhitehouseAustralian Grains Genebank, Agriculture Victoria Research Division, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Private Bag 260, Horsham, VIC, 3401, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3457
Olaniyi OyatomiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-374X
Dustin WolkisDepartment of Science and Conservation, National Tropical Botanical Garden, 3530 Papālina Road, Kalāheo, HI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed (gene)banking is an effective way to conserve cultivated and wild plant diversity. However, long-term funding is not always consistently sufficient, and there is a need to both strengthen the effectiveness of genebank operations and maximize cost efficiency. One way to control the cost of maintaining a germplasm collection is to optimize the quantity of seeds per accession that is placed into storage, depending on the expected length of time a seed lot will remain above the viability threshold, expected rates of use for distribution and viability testing and on the requirement to ensure a reserve. Here, we express this as an equation, which can be applied to cultivated species and adjusted to different scenarios, but also to inform decisions about use of accessions of wild species where the number of seeds available is limited, a common scenario for wild-species conservation seed banks. For many crop genebanks, given the expected longevity of seeds, it would be worthwhile to increase the number of seeds produced and processed for storage. This would also help to diminish the risk of genetic drift due to frequent cycles of regeneration but would have implications in terms of how accessions are regenerated, in particular, how many plants are used for regeneration and the size of storage facilities. The equation we present can also be rearranged and used to plan how to allocate seeds for testing and use when the number of seeds available is limited. This may have particular relevance for species conservation seed banks.

Indexed as

Genebank managementregenerationseed bankseed conservationseed multiplicationseed storage

Identifiers

PMID39996017
PMCPMC11849998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.