ArticlePeerJ2025
Construction and verification of a prognostic model for bladder cancer based on disulfidptosis-related angiogenesis genes.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Disulfide bond-related gene signature development for bladder cancer prognosis prediction and immune microenvironment characterization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer (BLCA) is the most common malignancy of the urinary system and one of the most common cancers worldwide. This study seeks to examine the influence of angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs) linked to disulfidptosis on BLCA patients and to formulate a prognostic model for evaluating their prognosis and response to immunotherapy. Methods: This study used sequencing data of BLCA in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Unsupervised consensus clustering analysis, cox regression analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were used to screen hub genes and construct a related prognostic risk model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and independent prognostic analysis were then used to verify the predictive performance of the signature genes. Clinical characteristics, immune status, and Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) of the prognostic risk model were evaluated. The expression levels of model genes within standard bladder epithelial cell lines (SV-HUC-1) and bladder cancer cell lines (T24 and SW1710) were quantified through qRT-PCR. Results: The constructed prognostic risk model can be used as an independent risk indicator for BLCA and was validated in an external dataset. Immune cell infiltration analysis showed that CD8+T cells, Tregs and dendritic cells were significantly different between the two groups. A significant increase was observed in the Stromal score, Immune score and ESTIMATE score in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group. The Immune Exclusion score and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score of the high-risk group were higher than those of the low-risk score group. Compared with the normal bladder epithelial cell line (SV-HUC-1), the expression levels of 2 model genes (COL5A2 and SCG2) in bladder cancer cell lines (T24 and SW1710) were significantly elevated. Conclusion: This study helps us understand the characteristics of disulfidptosis-related subgroups. The characteristics of disulfidptosis-related ARGs may be used to evaluate the prognosis and immunotherapy response of BLCA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.