Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995921›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Comparison of specialist ataxia centres with non-specialist services in terms of care access and organisation, health services resource utilisation and costs in Germany using patient-reported data.

Julie Vallortigara, Julie Greenfield, Barry Hunt, Holm Graessner, Carola Reinhard, Andreas Nadke, Bart-Jan Schuman, Deborah Hoffman, Steve Morris, Paola Giunti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ataxia patient care pathway and associated healthcare costs in Italy: a cross-sectional survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Friedreich's ataxia patient pathway in Europe.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julie VallortigaraAtaxia Centre, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square House, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Julie GreenfieldAtaxia UK, London, UK.
Barry HuntAtaxia UK, London, UK.
Holm GraessnerCentre for Rare Diseases and Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carola ReinhardCentre for Rare Diseases and Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas NadkeDeutsche Heredo Ataxie Gesellschaft (DHAG), Hofener Straße 76, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Bart-Jan SchumanFriedreich Ataxie Förderverein e.V., Am Heckenacker 9a, 85652, Pliening, Germany.
Deborah HoffmanTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Steve MorrisPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paola GiuntiAtaxia Centre, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square House, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ataxias are rare complex neurological disorders challenging to diagnose and manage. We explored the patient pathways, health care use and costs of individuals attending a specialist ataxia centre (SAC) compared with non-specialist settings in Germany. Methods: We distributed a survey to people with ataxia to gather information about diagnosis and management of the ataxias, utilisation of health care services, and patients' satisfaction in both SAC and non-specialist settings. We compared mean resource use and health service costs per patient, stratifying by whether patients attended a SAC or not. Results: We collected and analysed responses from 101 participants. For patients who visited both a SAC and a standard neurology clinic, 67.2 % reported that the care received at a SAC was better. Positive feedback about SAC services included understanding their condition (66.7 % positive feedback), giving practical advice to manage better their ataxia (66.7 % positive feedback) and offering opportunities to take part in research (79.2 % positive feedback). Costs were not significantly different between those attending a SAC and those who did not, although the average cost per patient per year found in SACs was higher compared with non-SACs. The mean total cost per patient over a one-year period was €2091 for non-SAC patients and €4043 for SAC patients (P = 0.19 in adjusted analyses). We identified barriers in accessing SACs including the lack of clear referral pathway and the travel required to such centres. We made recommendations about gaps identified in the care provided based on people's experience and feedback. Conclusions: This study provides useful information about ataxia patient care pathways in Germany, with higher patients' satisfaction in SAC compared to non-SAC, without a significant difference in costs. The findings can be used to change policy for better care for people with these rare complex neurological diseases.

Indexed as

AtaxiaCare pathwayCostsHealth service useSpecialist centre

Identifiers

PMID39995921
PMCPMC11849067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.