Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995914›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Enhancing surface detection: A comprehensive analysis of various YOLO models.

G Deepti Raj, B Prabadevi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G Deepti RajSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India.
B PrabadeviSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material defects can significantly affect strength, durability and overall quality. Complex backgrounds and variations in steel surface images often hinder productivity and quality in industrial environments. Accurate defect detection becomes difficult due to small target size and unclear features. However, implementing accurate and automated object detection algorithms mitigates these challenges, allowing errors or defects to be detected before processing. Version 5 of You Only Look Once (YOLO), a precisely optimized learning model, has undergone extensive testing on steel strip datasets, providing effective solutions for recognition and detection in industry environments. This study presents an improved YOLOv5 detection model, exploiting the efficient channel attention (ECA) and coordinated attention (CoordAtt) mechanisms. Our results show notable improvements, with the ECA hybrid attention mechanism achieving 2-4 times faster inference times while maintaining high accuracy. Additionally, CoordAtt integration minimizes the parameter count by 25 % and gives higher accuracy on one of the datasets. Comparative analysis with YOLOv6, YOLOv7, and YOLOv8 demonstrates the superior accuracy of the enhanced YOLOv5 model on the NEU-DET and GC10-DET steel strip benchmark datasets, highlighting its effectiveness in detecting and timely recognition of actual defects.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismsConvolution neural networksDefect detectionLeakyReLUObject detectionYOLOv5

Identifiers

PMID39995914
PMCPMC11849088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.