Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995897›Full record

ReviewJournal of blood medicine2025

Emerging Therapies in Hemophilia: Improving Equitable Access to Care.

Magdalena Lewandowska, Sonia Nasr, Amy D Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transforming Hemophilia Treatment With Novel Rebalancing Agents: Clinical Studies and Practical Perspectives.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magdalena LewandowskaIndiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sonia NasrGLOVAL LLC, Broomfield, Colorado, USA.
Amy D ShapiroIndiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, gene therapy and bio-engineered hemostatic molecules have revolutionized treatment for people with hemophilia. These innovative therapies aim to decrease treatment burden and improve patient quality of life. Additional novel therapies, including next-generation mimetics and agents that rebalance hemostasis, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Technological advances such as point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound and artificial intelligence may improve patient diagnostic and treatment outcomes. However, for the majority of patients with hemophilia worldwide, diagnosis and effective treatment are inaccessible. Achieving health equity for all hemophilia patients requires improved identification of barriers to optimal care, including socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, gender, disease severity, inhibitor status, age, and use of Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Access to novel hemophilia therapies should be ensured for all patients. Approaches to improving equity include a decision-making partnership between the patient and clinician, stakeholder engagement, and pharmaceutical industry support. The development of novel hemophilia therapies should be leveraged with a patient-centered care approach to improve health equity for all patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegene therapyhealth equitynon-factor therapypoint-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39995897
PMCPMC11849425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.