ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case report: Bevacizumab-induced cerebrovascular events: a case series report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salvianolic acid monomers against metastasis: Decoding the multilayered interception of EMT, angiogenesis and immune evasion (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Selective Targeting of Tip Endothelial Cells as a Therapeutic Strategy for Tumor Angiogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Combined treatment using repurposed synthetic peptide desmopressin and bevacizumab as a potential antiangiogenic strategy in osteosarcoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting tumor microenvironmental barriers to enhance immunogenic cell death in solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Real-world adverse event profile and signal characteristics of bevacizumab in glioma: a FAERS-based disproportionality analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical use, bevacizumab has improved the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of malignant solid tumors, and the safe use of bevacizumab has gradually become the mainstream direction of clinical, nursing and pharmaceutical research. Bevacizumab is a humanized anti-VEGF drug. By binding to VEGF, it loses the opportunity to activate VEGFR and then plays an anti-angiogenic role. In addition, more and more studies have emphasized the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors. Bevacizumab has its advantages in terms of crossing the blood-brain barrier, increasing radiosensitivity, and reducing radiation-induced brain edema. However, VEGF can maintain the normal function of vascular endothelial cells. Blocking the VEGF pathway can lead to endothelial dysfunction, and the anti-VEGF mechanism of bevacizumab will inevitably lead to a series of thrombotic events and bleeding events. This study reported six cases of cerebrovascular accidents, including ischemic stroke and cerebral hemorrhage, after bevacizumab use. At the same time, this study reviewed the related studies of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents caused by bevacizumab, and analyzed the management of such bevacizumab-related adverse events. We put forward our own views on the early identification and long-term management of adverse events, as well as the subsequent reuse of bevacizumab, hoping to provide more basis for the management of clinical bevacizumab application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.