ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
A CD36-based prediction model for sepsis-induced myocardial injury.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable gradient boosting machine model for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis-induced myocardial injury: a multicenter development, validation, and web-based clinical implementation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1-mediated ferroptosis suppression in sepsis: non-canonical antioxidant pathways, inflammatory regulation, and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Fh15 as an Antagonist of TLR4 Downregulating the Activation of NF-κB, Inducible Nitric Oxide, Phagosome Signaling Pathways, and Oxidative Stress of LPS-Stimulated Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI) is a prevalent form of organ dysfunction with a significant impact on the mortality rate among sepsis patients. This study aims to develop a predictive model for SIMI using plasma CD36 levels. Methods: A prospective study was conducted from January 1, 2023, to December 1, 2023, involving sepsis patients admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Medicine at Shanghai General Hospital. Plasma CD36 levels were measured within 48 h of ICU admission, prior to the diagnosis of sepsis-associated myocardial injury. Myocardial damage was assessed using troponin levels. Results: Two significant risk factors for SIMI were identified: age and elevated CD36 levels. CD36, THBS1, and BNP were determined to be independent mortality risk factors. The myocardial injury group exhibited higher plasma CD36 levels compared to the non-injury group. Additionally, the deceased group had higher plasma CD36 levels than the survivors. No significant differences in CD36 levels were observed between groups with lung and stomach infections or between Gram-positive and Gram-negative infection groups. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in CD36 levels between surgical and medical patients. A predictive model for SIMI was formulated as follows: ln [P/(1-P)] = -0.000818age + 0.4975756CD36 - 5.400293. The model's quality of fit was tested with a P-value of 0.4682, indicating a good degree of discrimination and calibration, as evidenced by the area under the ROC curve (0.7724). Conclusion: The prognosis of individuals with sepsis is closely associated with elevated CD36 levels. Elevated CD36 is identified as an independent risk factor for both SIMI and mortality in sepsis patients. The predictive model suggests that high CD36 levels are indicative of SIMI and are associated with a poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.