ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Evaluation of the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: A machine learning cluster analysis.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A narrative review of current evidence and emerging strategies.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is recommended by guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) and exerts a protective role against adverse outcomes of AF patients. But the possible differences in its effectiveness across the diverse range of patients in China have not been systematically evaluated. We aim to comprehensively evaluate multiple clinical characteristics of patients, and probe clusters of ABC criteria efficacy in patients with AF. Methods: We used data from an observational cohort that included 2,016 patients with AF. We utilized 45 baseline variables for cluster analysis. We evaluated the management patterns and adverse outcomes of identified phenotypes. We assessed the effectiveness of adherence to the ABC criteria at reducing adverse outcomes of phenotypes. Results: Cluster analysis identified AF patients into three distinct groups. The clusters include Cluster 1: old patients with the highest prevalence rates of atherosclerotic and/or other comorbidities (n = 964), Cluster 2: valve-comorbidities AF in young females (n = 407), and Cluster 3: low comorbidity patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 644). The clusters showed significant differences in MACNE, all-cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular death. All clusters showed that full adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACNE (all P < 0.05). For three clusters, adherence to the different 'A'/'B'/'C' criterion alone showed differential clinic impact. Conclusion: Our study suggested specific optimization strategies of risk stratification and integrated management for different groups of AF patients considering multiple clinical, genetic and socioeconomic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.