Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995802›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

"In some ways it feels like a specialism": Exploring the lived experience of multilingual maternity professionals - A qualitative interview study.

Emma Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emma BrooksInternational Centre for Intercultural Studies, UCL Institute of Education, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the experience of multilingual maternity staff working in UK NHS hospitals. Methods: As part of an exploratory qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with multilingual healthcare professionals, working in perinatal care in different NHS trusts across the United Kingdom. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and subsequently analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Where practitioners were able to draw on their linguistic skills, they felt that multilingualism was a specialism and appreciated by colleagues. Practitioners also felt that the utilisation of shared languages could boost the confidence of women and birthing people, as well as improving their understanding and sense of wellbeing. Conversely, several practitioners felt an obligation to offer linguistic support, noting that it added to a workload burden, and fear of litigation, that was not experienced by monolingual colleagues. Conclusion: Strategic utilisation of linguistically skilled NHS practitioners may hold the potential for advancing equity of care for migrant populations, who are regularly and disproportionately represented in data recording adverse outcomes. Innovation: Investing in institutional support and formal accreditation for multilingual health professionals would enable them to be able to operate with confidence, redress (invisibilized) workloads and contribute to advancing parity of care for migrant patients.

Indexed as

DiversityEDIMultilingualismPatient experienceWorkplace equity

Identifiers

PMID39995802
PMCPMC11848477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.