ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Contrast quality control for segmentation task based on deep learning models-Application to stroke lesion in CT imaging.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered diagnostic support for stroke via Telegram bot: preliminary findings.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although medical imaging plays a crucial role in stroke management, machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used in this field, particularly in lesion segmentation. Despite advances in acquisition technologies and segmentation architectures, one of the main challenges of subacute stroke lesion segmentation in computed tomography (CT) imaging is image contrast. Methods: To address this issue, we propose a method to assess the contrast quality of an image dataset with a ML trained model for segmentation. This method identifies the critical contrast level below which the medical-imaging model fails to learn meaningful content from images. Contrast measurement relies on the Fisher's ratio, estimating how well the stroke lesion is contrasted from the background. The critical contrast is found-thanks to the following three methods: Performance, graphical, and clustering analysis. Defining this threshold improves dataset design and accelerates training by excluding low-contrast images. Results: Application of this method to brain lesion segmentation in CT imaging highlights a Fisher's ratio threshold value of 0.05, and training validation of a new model without these images confirms this with similar results with only 60% of the training data, resulting in an almost 30% reduction in initial training time. Moreover, the model trained without the low-contrast images performed equally well with all images when tested on another database. Discussion: This study opens discussion with clinicians concerning the limitations, areas for improvement, and strategies for enhancing datasets and training models. While the methodology was only applied to stroke lesion segmentation in CT images, it has the potential to be adapted to other tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.