ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
The Dutch-translated cultural competence assessment scale for nurses: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dutch-translated Climate and Health Tool for nurses: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- "Health as Work", Structural Vulnerability Shaping Migrant Health in Non-Metropolitan Spain: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Using Design Thinking to Develop a Tool for Strengthening Nurses' Cultural Competence: Lessons Learned.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2026Article
- Navigating transition: a qualitative study on the clinical challenges faced by Chinese nursing master's graduates.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Researchers have revealed significant disparities in safety events and patient outcomes between minority and non-minority populations, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of cultural competence. As frontline caregivers, nurses play a key role in providing culturally-sensitive care. Measuring cultural competence can be challenging. The Cultural Competence Assessment, developed and validated in the United States of America, can help to address these challenges. Method: The aim was to determine the translation and cross-cultural adaptation, while evaluating the psychometric properties, of the Dutch version of the Cultural Competence Assessment among Dutch nurses. We used a cross-sectional design and conducted the study in two phases. Nurses from all over the Netherlands were recruited through the newsletter of the Dutch nurses association and internal distribution by healthcare organisations. The first phase focused on cross-cultural adaptation and translation. The second phase focused on psychometric testing. Data were analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was evaluated, utilising McDonald's omega. Results: The sample consisted of 447 Dutch nurses working in different healthcare settings. The original Cultural Competence Assessment consisting of 29 items was reduced to 27 items in the first phase of the study. After CFA, the best fit was obtained with a two-factor model consisting of 15 items, with a proficient level of internal consistency. Conclusion: With the two-factor, 15-item Dutch Cultural Competence Assessment, we have provided Dutch nurses with an instrument to self-assess their cultural competence, paying special attention to their awareness, sensitivity, and behaviour when caring for people with cultural differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.